DDD
3D Systems Corporation
DDD
(1.0)2,62 USD
-10.3% ROA
-58.22% ROE
-7.46x PER
731.218.320,00 USD
76.26% DER
0% Yield
-76.3% NPM
3D Systems Corporation Stock Analysis
3D Systems Corporation Fundamental Analysis
Fundamental analysis in stock investing is like studying the foundation of a house before buying it. It involves looking at a company's financial health, like its earnings, assets, and debts, to determine if it's a good investment based on its fundamental strength and potential for growth.
| # | Analysis | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
PBV
The stock's low PBV ratio (0.88x) suggests it's undervalued, making it an attractive opportunity for investors. |
|
| 2 |
DER
The stock has a reasonable amount of debt compared to its ownership (74%), suggesting a balanced financial position and a moderate level of risk. |
|
| 3 |
Graham Number
The Graham number of this company suggests that its stock price may be undervalued, indicating a potentially attractive investment opportunity. |
|
| 4 |
ROE
The stock's ROE indicates a negative return (-16.63%) on shareholders' equity, suggesting poor financial performance. |
|
| 5 |
ROA
The stock's ROA (-12.68%) suggests that it's struggling to generate profits from its assets, making it a risky choice for investment. |
|
| 6 |
Revenue Growth
Company's revenue has stayed stagnant, showing no signs of improvement and making it a less favorable choice. |
|
| 7 |
Net Profit Growth
Throughout the last five years, this company's net profit has remained unchanged, indicating a lack of growth and making it a less favorable investment option. |
|
| 8 |
Assets Growth
Regrettably, this company's revenue has shown no signs of growth over the past three years, suggesting limited potential for returns and making it a less appealing choice. |
|
| 9 |
Dividend Growth
Investors should note the company's stagnant dividend growth over the past three years, indicating limited profitability and potentially diminishing returns. |
|
| 10 |
Dividend
The company's decision to withhold dividends for three years raises questions about its ability to generate consistent returns. |
|
| 11 |
Buffet Intrinsic Value
Warren Buffett's formula suggests that the company's stock is overpriced (-3), presenting a possible disadvantage for investors as its market price surpasses its estimated intrinsic value. |
3D Systems Corporation Technical Analysis
Technical analysis in stock investing is like reading the patterns on a weather map to predict future weather conditions. It involves studying past stock price movements and trading volumes to make predictions about where a stock's price might go next, without necessarily looking at the company's financial health.
| # | Analysis | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Awesome Oscillator | Buy |
| 2 | MACD | Buy |
| 3 | RSI | Hold |
| 4 | Stoch RSI | Sell |
3D Systems Corporation Price Chart
Financial Statements
Financial statements are like report cards for companies. They show how much money a company makes (income statement), what it owns and owes (balance sheet), and where it spends its money (cash flow statement), helping stock investors understand if a company is healthy and worth investing in.
Income Statements
An income statement for a company is like a scoreboard for its profits and losses. It shows how much money the company made (revenue) and how much it spent to make that money (expenses), helping stock investors see if a company is making a profit or not.
Revenue in stock investing is the total amount of money a company earns from its sales, and it's a key factor that investors consider to assess a company's financial performance and growth potential.
| Year | Revenue | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 4.600.000 | |
| 1989 | 17.500.000 | 73.71% |
| 1990 | 25.000.000 | 30% |
| 1991 | 19.500.000 | -28.21% |
| 1992 | 26.000.000 | 25% |
| 1993 | 31.100.000 | 16.4% |
| 1994 | 43.300.000 | 28.18% |
| 1995 | 62.600.000 | 30.83% |
| 1996 | 79.600.000 | 21.36% |
| 1997 | 90.300.000 | 11.85% |
| 1998 | 98.100.000 | 7.95% |
| 1999 | 96.900.000 | -1.24% |
| 2000 | 109.675.000 | 11.65% |
| 2001 | 121.224.000 | 9.53% |
| 2002 | 115.961.000 | -4.54% |
| 2003 | 110.015.000 | -5.4% |
| 2004 | 125.379.000 | 12.25% |
| 2005 | 139.670.000 | 10.23% |
| 2006 | 134.820.000 | -3.6% |
| 2007 | 156.516.000 | 13.86% |
| 2008 | 138.940.000 | -12.65% |
| 2009 | 112.835.000 | -23.14% |
| 2010 | 159.868.000 | 29.42% |
| 2011 | 230.423.000 | 30.62% |
| 2012 | 353.633.000 | 34.84% |
| 2013 | 513.400.000 | 31.12% |
| 2014 | 653.652.000 | 21.46% |
| 2015 | 666.163.000 | 1.88% |
| 2016 | 632.965.000 | -5.24% |
| 2017 | 646.069.000 | 2.03% |
| 2018 | 687.660.000 | 6.05% |
| 2019 | 629.094.000 | -9.31% |
| 2020 | 557.240.000 | -12.89% |
| 2021 | 615.639.000 | 9.49% |
| 2022 | 538.031.000 | -14.42% |
| 2023 | 495.164.000 | -8.66% |
Research and Development Expenses are the costs a company incurs to create and improve its products or services, which can be important for investors to evaluate a company's innovation and potential for future growth.
| Year | Research and Development Expenses | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 0 | |
| 1989 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990 | 0 | 0% |
| 1991 | 0 | 0% |
| 1992 | 0 | 0% |
| 1993 | 0 | 0% |
| 1994 | 3.200.000 | 100% |
| 1995 | 6.100.000 | 47.54% |
| 1996 | 7.700.000 | 20.78% |
| 1997 | 11.000.000 | 30% |
| 1998 | 9.400.000 | -17.02% |
| 1999 | 8.900.000 | -5.62% |
| 2000 | 7.814.000 | -13.9% |
| 2001 | 10.710.000 | 27.04% |
| 2002 | 15.366.000 | 30.3% |
| 2003 | 9.031.000 | -70.15% |
| 2004 | 10.474.000 | 13.78% |
| 2005 | 12.176.000 | 13.98% |
| 2006 | 14.098.000 | 13.63% |
| 2007 | 14.430.000 | 2.3% |
| 2008 | 15.199.000 | 5.06% |
| 2009 | 11.129.000 | -36.57% |
| 2010 | 10.725.000 | -3.77% |
| 2011 | 14.331.000 | 25.16% |
| 2012 | 23.203.000 | 38.24% |
| 2013 | 43.489.000 | 46.65% |
| 2014 | 75.395.000 | 42.32% |
| 2015 | 92.770.000 | 18.73% |
| 2016 | 88.395.000 | -4.95% |
| 2017 | 94.627.000 | 6.59% |
| 2018 | 95.298.000 | 0.7% |
| 2019 | 80.790.000 | -17.96% |
| 2020 | 74.143.000 | -8.97% |
| 2021 | 69.150.000 | -7.22% |
| 2022 | 87.071.000 | 20.58% |
| 2023 | 87.928.000 | 0.97% |
General and Administrative Expenses are the costs a company incurs to run its day-to-day operations, such as office rent, salaries, and utilities, which investors consider to understand a company's overall efficiency and management effectiveness.
| Year | General and Administrative Expenses | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 0 | |
| 1989 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990 | 0 | 0% |
| 1991 | 0 | 0% |
| 1992 | 0 | 0% |
| 1993 | 0 | 0% |
| 1994 | 0 | 0% |
| 1995 | 0 | 0% |
| 1996 | 0 | 0% |
| 1997 | 0 | 0% |
| 1998 | 0 | 0% |
| 1999 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000 | 0 | 0% |
| 2001 | 0 | 0% |
| 2002 | 0 | 0% |
| 2003 | 0 | 0% |
| 2004 | 0 | 0% |
| 2005 | 0 | 0% |
| 2006 | 0 | 0% |
| 2007 | 0 | 0% |
| 2008 | 0 | 0% |
| 2009 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010 | 0 | 0% |
| 2011 | 0 | 0% |
| 2012 | 0 | 0% |
| 2013 | 0 | 0% |
| 2014 | 0 | 0% |
| 2015 | 0 | 0% |
| 2016 | 0 | 0% |
| 2017 | 0 | 0% |
| 2018 | 0 | 0% |
| 2019 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020 | 0 | 0% |
| 2021 | 0 | 0% |
| 2022 | 0 | 0% |
| 2023 | 0 | 0% |
EBITDA stands for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. It is a measure that helps stock investors analyze a company's profitability by looking at its earnings without considering certain expenses. This helps to get a clearer picture of the company's financial performance and its ability to generate cash flow.
| Year | EBITDA | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | -5.400.000 | |
| 1989 | -2.200.000 | -145.45% |
| 1990 | -1.900.000 | -15.79% |
| 1991 | -8.400.000 | 77.38% |
| 1992 | -700.000 | -1100% |
| 1993 | 2.100.000 | 133.33% |
| 1994 | 5.000.000 | 58% |
| 1995 | 6.600.000 | 24.24% |
| 1996 | 7.600.000 | 13.16% |
| 1997 | -3.700.000 | 305.41% |
| 1998 | 7.700.000 | 148.05% |
| 1999 | -1.500.000 | 613.33% |
| 2000 | 18.583.000 | 108.07% |
| 2001 | 6.608.000 | -181.22% |
| 2002 | -21.284.000 | 131.05% |
| 2003 | -5.663.000 | -275.84% |
| 2004 | 13.767.000 | 141.13% |
| 2005 | 17.563.000 | 21.61% |
| 2006 | -5.870.000 | 399.2% |
| 2007 | 1.841.000 | 418.85% |
| 2008 | 1.586.000 | -16.08% |
| 2009 | 8.959.000 | 82.3% |
| 2010 | 28.440.000 | 68.5% |
| 2011 | 46.404.000 | 38.71% |
| 2012 | 81.800.000 | 43.27% |
| 2013 | 111.305.000 | 26.51% |
| 2014 | 81.503.000 | -36.57% |
| 2015 | -29.431.000 | 376.93% |
| 2016 | 22.115.000 | 233.08% |
| 2017 | 8.068.000 | -174.11% |
| 2018 | 16.102.000 | 49.89% |
| 2019 | -6.708.000 | 340.04% |
| 2020 | -22.363.000 | 70% |
| 2021 | 1.554.000 | 1539.06% |
| 2022 | -78.333.000 | 101.98% |
| 2023 | 88.888.000 | 188.13% |
Gross profit is the money a company makes from selling its products or services after subtracting the cost of producing or providing them, and it is an important measure for investors to understand a company's profitability.
| Year | Gross Profit | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 2.700.000 | |
| 1989 | 11.000.000 | 75.45% |
| 1990 | 15.100.000 | 27.15% |
| 1991 | 8.900.000 | -69.66% |
| 1992 | 14.000.000 | 36.43% |
| 1993 | 16.500.000 | 15.15% |
| 1994 | 22.800.000 | 27.63% |
| 1995 | 34.300.000 | 33.53% |
| 1996 | 41.400.000 | 17.15% |
| 1997 | 38.200.000 | -8.38% |
| 1998 | 48.400.000 | 21.07% |
| 1999 | 42.700.000 | -13.35% |
| 2000 | 59.107.000 | 27.76% |
| 2001 | 53.375.000 | -10.74% |
| 2002 | 46.621.000 | -14.49% |
| 2003 | 43.142.000 | -8.06% |
| 2004 | 56.091.000 | 23.09% |
| 2005 | 63.130.000 | 11.15% |
| 2006 | 46.257.000 | -36.48% |
| 2007 | 63.460.000 | 27.11% |
| 2008 | 55.968.000 | -13.39% |
| 2009 | 49.730.000 | -12.54% |
| 2010 | 73.976.000 | 32.78% |
| 2011 | 109.028.000 | 32.15% |
| 2012 | 181.196.000 | 39.83% |
| 2013 | 267.594.000 | 32.29% |
| 2014 | 317.434.000 | 15.7% |
| 2015 | 291.809.000 | -8.78% |
| 2016 | 309.751.000 | 5.79% |
| 2017 | 304.839.000 | -1.61% |
| 2018 | 324.394.000 | 6.03% |
| 2019 | 278.041.000 | -16.67% |
| 2020 | 223.375.000 | -24.47% |
| 2021 | 263.778.000 | 15.32% |
| 2022 | 214.233.000 | -23.13% |
| 2023 | 221.400.000 | 3.24% |
Net income in stock investing is like the money a company actually gets to keep as profit after paying all its bills, and it's an important measure to understand how well a company is doing financially.
| Year | Net Profit | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | -5.100.000 | |
| 1989 | -1.900.000 | -168.42% |
| 1990 | -2.300.000 | 17.39% |
| 1991 | -9.400.000 | 75.53% |
| 1992 | -2.800.000 | -235.71% |
| 1993 | 500.000 | 660% |
| 1994 | 4.500.000 | 88.89% |
| 1995 | 8.900.000 | 49.44% |
| 1996 | 4.600.000 | -93.48% |
| 1997 | -4.600.000 | 200% |
| 1998 | 2.100.000 | 319.05% |
| 1999 | -5.300.000 | 139.62% |
| 2000 | 8.144.000 | 165.08% |
| 2001 | -1.341.000 | 707.31% |
| 2002 | -14.866.000 | 90.98% |
| 2003 | -26.023.000 | 42.87% |
| 2004 | 2.561.000 | 1116.13% |
| 2005 | 10.083.000 | 74.6% |
| 2006 | -29.280.000 | 134.44% |
| 2007 | -6.740.000 | -334.42% |
| 2008 | -6.154.000 | -9.52% |
| 2009 | 1.066.000 | 677.3% |
| 2010 | 19.566.000 | 94.55% |
| 2011 | 35.420.000 | 44.76% |
| 2012 | 38.941.000 | 9.04% |
| 2013 | 44.107.000 | 11.71% |
| 2014 | 11.637.000 | -279.02% |
| 2015 | -655.492.000 | 101.78% |
| 2016 | -38.419.000 | -1606.17% |
| 2017 | -66.191.000 | 41.96% |
| 2018 | -45.505.000 | -45.46% |
| 2019 | -69.632.000 | 34.65% |
| 2020 | -149.594.000 | 53.45% |
| 2021 | 322.052.000 | 146.45% |
| 2022 | -122.949.000 | 361.94% |
| 2023 | -46.816.000 | -162.62% |
EPS, or earnings per share, is a measure that shows how much profit a company has earned for each outstanding share of its stock, and it is important for stock investors as it helps understand the profitability of a company and compare it with other companies in the market.
| Year | Earning per Share (EPS) | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | -1 | |
| 1989 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990 | 0 | 0% |
| 1991 | -1 | 0% |
| 1992 | 0 | 0% |
| 1993 | 0 | 0% |
| 1994 | 0 | 0% |
| 1995 | 0 | 0% |
| 1996 | 0 | 0% |
| 1997 | 0 | 0% |
| 1998 | 0 | 0% |
| 1999 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000 | 0 | 0% |
| 2001 | 0 | 0% |
| 2002 | 0 | 0% |
| 2003 | -1 | 0% |
| 2004 | 0 | 0% |
| 2005 | 0 | 0% |
| 2006 | -1 | 0% |
| 2007 | 0 | 0% |
| 2008 | 0 | 0% |
| 2009 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010 | 0 | 0% |
| 2011 | 0 | 0% |
| 2012 | 0 | 0% |
| 2013 | 0 | 0% |
| 2014 | 0 | 0% |
| 2015 | -6 | 100% |
| 2016 | 0 | 0% |
| 2017 | -1 | 0% |
| 2018 | 0 | 0% |
| 2019 | -1 | 0% |
| 2020 | -1 | 100% |
| 2021 | 3 | 150% |
| 2022 | -1 | 0% |
| 2023 | 0 | 0% |
Cashflow Statements
Cashflow statements show the movement of money in and out of a company, helping stock investors understand how much money a company makes and spends. By examining cashflow statements, investors can assess if a company is generating enough cash to pay its bills, invest in growth, and provide returns to stockholders.
Free cash flow is the leftover cash that a company generates after covering its operating expenses and capital expenditures, which is important for stock investors as it shows how much money a company has available to invest in growth, pay dividends, or reduce debt.
| Year | Free Cashflow | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | -6.320.000 | |
| 1989 | -8.430.000 | 25.03% |
| 1990 | -7.400.000 | -13.92% |
| 1991 | -4.400.000 | -68.18% |
| 1992 | -4.400.000 | 0% |
| 1993 | 3.000.000 | 246.67% |
| 1994 | -100.000 | 3100% |
| 1995 | -2.100.000 | 95.24% |
| 1996 | -16.400.000 | 87.2% |
| 1997 | -13.400.000 | -22.39% |
| 1998 | 1.800.000 | 844.44% |
| 1999 | -6.100.000 | 129.51% |
| 2000 | 233.000 | 2718.03% |
| 2001 | 3.332.000 | 93.01% |
| 2002 | -1.896.000 | 275.74% |
| 2003 | 308.000 | 715.58% |
| 2004 | 2.147.000 | 85.65% |
| 2005 | -8.411.000 | 125.53% |
| 2006 | -19.594.000 | 57.07% |
| 2007 | 399.000 | 5010.78% |
| 2008 | -9.587.000 | 104.16% |
| 2009 | 6.537.000 | 246.66% |
| 2010 | 30.259.000 | 78.4% |
| 2011 | 24.454.000 | -23.74% |
| 2012 | 49.091.000 | 50.19% |
| 2013 | 16.564.000 | -196.37% |
| 2014 | 27.631.000 | 40.05% |
| 2015 | -26.434.000 | 204.53% |
| 2016 | 39.203.000 | 167.43% |
| 2017 | -6.099.000 | 742.78% |
| 2018 | -36.868.000 | 83.46% |
| 2019 | 7.596.000 | 585.36% |
| 2020 | -33.764.000 | 122.5% |
| 2021 | 29.356.000 | 215.02% |
| 2022 | -90.894.000 | 132.3% |
| 2023 | -33.070.000 | -174.85% |
Operating cash flow represents the cash generated or consumed by a company's day-to-day operations, excluding external investing or financing activities, and is crucial for stock investors as it shows how much cash a company is generating from its core business operations.
| Year | Operating Cashflow | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | -4.910.000 | |
| 1989 | -5.610.000 | 12.48% |
| 1990 | -2.900.000 | -93.45% |
| 1991 | -2.700.000 | -7.41% |
| 1992 | -3.000.000 | 10% |
| 1993 | 5.100.000 | 158.82% |
| 1994 | 3.000.000 | -70% |
| 1995 | 3.000.000 | 0% |
| 1996 | -7.000.000 | 142.86% |
| 1997 | -5.000.000 | -40% |
| 1998 | 7.600.000 | 165.79% |
| 1999 | 1.600.000 | -375% |
| 2000 | 5.126.000 | 68.79% |
| 2001 | 6.649.000 | 22.91% |
| 2002 | 1.314.000 | -406.01% |
| 2003 | 1.182.000 | -11.17% |
| 2004 | 2.928.000 | 59.63% |
| 2005 | -5.808.000 | 150.41% |
| 2006 | -8.330.000 | 30.28% |
| 2007 | 2.625.000 | 417.33% |
| 2008 | -3.479.000 | 175.45% |
| 2009 | 7.734.000 | 144.98% |
| 2010 | 31.844.000 | 75.71% |
| 2011 | 27.660.000 | -15.13% |
| 2012 | 53.044.000 | 47.85% |
| 2013 | 25.184.000 | -110.63% |
| 2014 | 51.111.000 | 50.73% |
| 2015 | -3.128.000 | 1733.98% |
| 2016 | 56.902.000 | 105.5% |
| 2017 | 25.941.000 | -119.35% |
| 2018 | 4.796.000 | -440.89% |
| 2019 | 31.581.000 | 84.81% |
| 2020 | -20.121.000 | 256.96% |
| 2021 | 48.147.000 | 141.79% |
| 2022 | -68.395.000 | 170.4% |
| 2023 | -25.624.000 | -166.92% |
Capex, short for capital expenditures, refers to the money a company spends on acquiring or upgrading tangible assets like buildings, equipment, or technology, which is important for stock investors as it indicates how much a company is investing in its infrastructure to support future growth and profitability.
| Year | Capital Expenditure | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 1.410.000 | |
| 1989 | 2.820.000 | 50% |
| 1990 | 4.500.000 | 37.33% |
| 1991 | 1.700.000 | -164.71% |
| 1992 | 1.400.000 | -21.43% |
| 1993 | 2.100.000 | 33.33% |
| 1994 | 3.100.000 | 32.26% |
| 1995 | 5.100.000 | 39.22% |
| 1996 | 9.400.000 | 45.74% |
| 1997 | 8.400.000 | -11.9% |
| 1998 | 5.800.000 | -44.83% |
| 1999 | 7.700.000 | 24.68% |
| 2000 | 4.893.000 | -57.37% |
| 2001 | 3.317.000 | -47.51% |
| 2002 | 3.210.000 | -3.33% |
| 2003 | 874.000 | -267.28% |
| 2004 | 781.000 | -11.91% |
| 2005 | 2.603.000 | 70% |
| 2006 | 11.264.000 | 76.89% |
| 2007 | 2.226.000 | -406.02% |
| 2008 | 6.108.000 | 63.56% |
| 2009 | 1.197.000 | -410.28% |
| 2010 | 1.585.000 | 24.48% |
| 2011 | 3.206.000 | 50.56% |
| 2012 | 3.953.000 | 18.9% |
| 2013 | 8.620.000 | 54.14% |
| 2014 | 23.480.000 | 63.29% |
| 2015 | 23.306.000 | -0.75% |
| 2016 | 17.699.000 | -31.68% |
| 2017 | 32.040.000 | 44.76% |
| 2018 | 41.664.000 | 23.1% |
| 2019 | 23.985.000 | -73.71% |
| 2020 | 13.643.000 | -75.8% |
| 2021 | 18.791.000 | 27.4% |
| 2022 | 22.499.000 | 16.48% |
| 2023 | 7.446.000 | -202.16% |
Balance Sheet
Balance sheets provide a snapshot of a company's financial health and its assets (such as cash, inventory, and property) and liabilities (like debts and obligations) at a specific point in time. For stock investors, balance sheets help assess the company's overall worth and evaluate its ability to meet financial obligations and support future growth.
Equity refers to the ownership interest or stake that shareholders have in a company, representing their claim on its assets and earnings after all debts and liabilities are paid.
| Year | Equity | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 1.600.000 | |
| 1989 | 15.200.000 | 89.47% |
| 1990 | 18.600.000 | 18.28% |
| 1991 | 10.300.000 | -80.58% |
| 1992 | 15.000.000 | 31.33% |
| 1993 | 14.700.000 | -2.04% |
| 1994 | 20.000.000 | 26.5% |
| 1995 | 63.000.000 | 68.25% |
| 1996 | 68.700.000 | 8.3% |
| 1997 | 64.600.000 | -6.35% |
| 1998 | 66.600.000 | 3% |
| 1999 | 59.600.000 | -11.74% |
| 2000 | 71.796.000 | 16.99% |
| 2001 | 79.719.000 | 9.94% |
| 2002 | 59.866.000 | -33.16% |
| 2003 | 36.698.000 | -63.13% |
| 2004 | 53.064.000 | 30.84% |
| 2005 | 69.476.000 | 23.62% |
| 2006 | 69.669.000 | 0.28% |
| 2007 | 104.769.000 | 33.5% |
| 2008 | 102.234.000 | -2.48% |
| 2009 | 104.697.000 | 2.35% |
| 2010 | 133.119.000 | 21.35% |
| 2011 | 254.788.000 | 47.75% |
| 2012 | 480.333.000 | 46.96% |
| 2013 | 932.646.000 | 48.5% |
| 2014 | 1.292.918.000 | 27.87% |
| 2015 | 655.909.000 | -97.12% |
| 2016 | 629.873.000 | -4.13% |
| 2017 | 618.854.000 | -1.78% |
| 2018 | 584.859.000 | -5.81% |
| 2019 | 513.896.000 | -13.81% |
| 2020 | 430.723.000 | -19.31% |
| 2021 | 842.381.000 | 48.87% |
| 2022 | 751.706.000 | -12.06% |
| 2023 | 701.466.000 | -7.16% |
Assets represent the valuable resources that a company owns, such as cash, inventory, property, and equipment, and understanding a company's assets helps investors assess its value and potential for generating future profits.
| Year | Assets | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 7.400.000 | |
| 1989 | 20.500.000 | 63.9% |
| 1990 | 32.000.000 | 35.94% |
| 1991 | 19.600.000 | -63.27% |
| 1992 | 22.000.000 | 10.91% |
| 1993 | 24.600.000 | 10.57% |
| 1994 | 30.500.000 | 19.34% |
| 1995 | 81.600.000 | 62.62% |
| 1996 | 92.200.000 | 11.5% |
| 1997 | 91.300.000 | -0.99% |
| 1998 | 95.100.000 | 4% |
| 1999 | 90.700.000 | -4.85% |
| 2000 | 109.897.000 | 17.47% |
| 2001 | 166.005.000 | 33.8% |
| 2002 | 132.233.000 | -25.54% |
| 2003 | 131.465.000 | -0.58% |
| 2004 | 131.496.000 | 0.02% |
| 2005 | 150.942.000 | 12.88% |
| 2006 | 166.194.000 | 9.18% |
| 2007 | 167.385.000 | 0.71% |
| 2008 | 153.002.000 | -9.4% |
| 2009 | 150.403.000 | -1.73% |
| 2010 | 208.800.000 | 27.97% |
| 2011 | 462.974.000 | 54.9% |
| 2012 | 677.442.000 | 31.66% |
| 2013 | 1.097.856.000 | 38.29% |
| 2014 | 1.525.970.000 | 28.06% |
| 2015 | 893.275.000 | -70.83% |
| 2016 | 849.153.000 | -5.2% |
| 2017 | 896.764.000 | 5.31% |
| 2018 | 825.832.000 | -8.59% |
| 2019 | 807.312.000 | -2.29% |
| 2020 | 733.055.000 | -10.13% |
| 2021 | 1.549.099.000 | 52.68% |
| 2022 | 1.447.524.000 | -7.02% |
| 2023 | 1.392.754.000 | -3.93% |
Liabilities refer to the financial obligations or debts that a company owes to creditors or external parties, and understanding a company's liabilities is important for investors as it helps assess the company's financial risk and ability to meet its obligations.
| Year | Liabilities | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 5.800.000 | |
| 1989 | 5.300.000 | -9.43% |
| 1990 | 13.400.000 | 60.45% |
| 1991 | 9.300.000 | -44.09% |
| 1992 | 7.000.000 | -32.86% |
| 1993 | 9.900.000 | 29.29% |
| 1994 | 10.500.000 | 5.71% |
| 1995 | 18.600.000 | 43.55% |
| 1996 | 23.500.000 | 20.85% |
| 1997 | 26.700.000 | 11.99% |
| 1998 | 28.500.000 | 6.32% |
| 1999 | 31.100.000 | 8.36% |
| 2000 | 38.101.000 | 18.37% |
| 2001 | 86.286.000 | 55.84% |
| 2002 | 72.367.000 | -19.23% |
| 2003 | 94.767.000 | 23.64% |
| 2004 | 78.432.000 | -20.83% |
| 2005 | 81.466.000 | 3.72% |
| 2006 | 96.525.000 | 15.6% |
| 2007 | 62.616.000 | -54.15% |
| 2008 | 50.768.000 | -23.34% |
| 2009 | 45.633.000 | -11.25% |
| 2010 | 75.681.000 | 39.7% |
| 2011 | 208.186.000 | 63.65% |
| 2012 | 197.109.000 | -5.62% |
| 2013 | 164.064.000 | -20.14% |
| 2014 | 222.973.000 | 26.42% |
| 2015 | 229.757.000 | 2.95% |
| 2016 | 213.581.000 | -7.57% |
| 2017 | 271.944.000 | 21.46% |
| 2018 | 240.973.000 | -12.85% |
| 2019 | 293.416.000 | 17.87% |
| 2020 | 302.332.000 | 2.95% |
| 2021 | 706.718.000 | 57.22% |
| 2022 | 695.818.000 | -1.57% |
| 2023 | 691.288.000 | -0.66% |
3D Systems Corporation Financial Ratio (TTM)
Valuation Metrics
- Revenue per Share
- 3.88
- Net Income per Share
- -0.73
- Price to Earning Ratio
- -7.46x
- Price To Sales Ratio
- 1.45x
- POCF Ratio
- -8.13
- PFCF Ratio
- -6.4
- Price to Book Ratio
- 1.02
- EV to Sales
- 1.62
- EV Over EBITDA
- -19.47
- EV to Operating CashFlow
- -9.33
- EV to FreeCashFlow
- -7.17
- Earnings Yield
- -0.13
- FreeCashFlow Yield
- -0.16
- Market Cap
- 0,73 Bil.
- Enterprise Value
- 0,82 Bil.
- Graham Number
- 9.42
- Graham NetNet
- -0.7
Income Statement Metrics
- Net Income per Share
- -0.73
- Income Quality
- 0.92
- ROE
- -0.13
- Return On Assets
- -0.38
- Return On Capital Employed
- -0.14
- Net Income per EBT
- 1.01
- EBT Per Ebit
- 3.21
- Ebit per Revenue
- -0.24
- Effective Tax Rate
- 0
Margins
- Sales, General, & Administrative to Revenue
- 0
- Research & Developement to Revenue
- 0.18
- Stock Based Compensation to Revenue
- 0.05
- Gross Profit Margin
- 0.41
- Operating Profit Margin
- -0.24
- Pretax Profit Margin
- -0.76
- Net Profit Margin
- -0.76
Dividends
- Dividend Yield
- 0
- Dividend Yield %
- 0
- Payout Ratio
- 0
- Dividend Per Share
- 0
Operating Metrics
- Operating Cashflow per Share
- -0.67
- Free CashFlow per Share
- -0.88
- Capex to Operating CashFlow
- 0.3
- Capex to Revenue
- -0.05
- Capex to Depreciation
- -0.71
- Return on Invested Capital
- -0.08
- Return on Tangible Assets
- -0.1
- Days Sales Outstanding
- 75.4
- Days Payables Outstanding
- 56.31
- Days of Inventory on Hand
- 186.87
- Receivables Turnover
- 4.84
- Payables Turnover
- 6.48
- Inventory Turnover
- 1.95
- Capex per Share
- -0.2
Balance Sheet
- Cash per Share
- 3,42
- Book Value per Share
- 5,37
- Tangible Book Value per Share
- 1.83
- Shareholders Equity per Share
- 5.37
- Interest Debt per Share
- 4.19
- Debt to Equity
- 0.76
- Debt to Assets
- 0.38
- Net Debt to EBITDA
- -2.09
- Current Ratio
- 5.36
- Tangible Asset Value
- 0,24 Bil.
- Net Current Asset Value
- 0,05 Bil.
- Invested Capital
- 0.76
- Working Capital
- 0,60 Bil.
- Intangibles to Total Assets
- 0.33
- Average Receivables
- 0,10 Bil.
- Average Payables
- 0,05 Bil.
- Average Inventory
- 154579000
- Debt to Market Cap
- 0.73
Dividends
Dividends in stock investing are like rewards that companies give to their shareholders. They are a portion of the company's profits distributed to investors, typically in the form of cash payments, as a way for them to share in the company's success.
| Year | Dividends | Growth |
|---|
3D Systems Corporation Profile
About 3D Systems Corporation
3D Systems Corporation, through its subsidiaries, provides 3D printing and digital manufacturing solutions in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. The company offers 3D printers, such as stereolithography, selective laser sintering, direct metal printing, multi jet printing, color jet printing, and extrusion and SLA based bioprinting that transform digital data input generated by 3D design software, computer aided design (CAD) software, or other 3D design tools into printed parts. It also develops, blends, and markets various print materials, such as plastic, nylon, metal, composite, elastomeric, wax, polymeric dental, and bio-compatible materials. In addition, the company provides digital design tools, including software, scanners, and haptic devices, as well as solutions for product design, simulation, mold and die design, 3D scan-to-print, reverse engineering, production machining, metrology, and inspection and manufacturing workflows under the Geomagic brand. Further, it offers 3D Sprint and 3DXpert, a proprietary software to prepare and optimize CAD data and manage the additive manufacturing processes, which provides automated support building and placement, build platform management, print simulation, and print queue management; and Bioprint Pro, a software solution that allows researchers to design and bioprint repeatable experiments. Additionally, the company provides maintenance and training services; manufacturing services; and software and precision healthcare services. It primarily serves companies and small and midsize businesses in medical, dental, automotive, aerospace, durable good, government, defense, technology, jewelry, electronic, education, consumer good, energy, biotechnology, and other industries through direct sales force, channel partners, and appointed distributors. 3D Systems Corporation was founded in 1986 and is headquartered in Rock Hill, South Carolina.
- CEO
- Dr. Jeffrey Alan Graves Ph.D.
- Employee
- 2.032
- Address
-
333 Three D Systems Circle
Rock Hill, 29730
3D Systems Corporation Executives & BODs
| # | Name | Age |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Mr. Jeffrey Creech Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
70 |
| 2 |
Mr. Andrew Martin Johnson Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, Secretary & Chief Corporate Development Officer |
70 |
| 3 |
Mr. Reji Puthenveetil Executive Vice President of Industrial Solutions & Chief Commercial Officer |
70 |
| 4 |
Ms. Phyllis B. Nordstrom Executive Vice President, Chief People Officer & Chief Administrative Officer |
70 |
| 5 |
Mr. Harriss T. Currie President - Regenerative Medicine |
70 |
| 6 |
Dr. Jeffrey Alan Graves Ph.D. President, Chief Executive Officer & Director |
70 |
| 7 |
Ms. Margaret E. Wicklund Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer & Head of Finance Transformation |
70 |
| 8 |
Dr. Charles W. Hull Co-Founder, Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer of Regenerative Medicine & Director Emeritus |
70 |
| 9 |
Dr. Joseph Zuiker Executive Vice President of Engineering & Operations |
70 |
| 10 |
Mr. Michael McCloskey Treasurer & Vice President of Investor Relations |
70 |
3D Systems Corporation Competitors
