OTLC
Oncotelic Therapeutics, Inc.
OTLC
(0.8)0,03 USD
-5.42% ROA
-10.18% ROE
-8.43x PER
10.563.020,00 USD
106.94% DER
0% Yield
-1770.27% NPM
Oncotelic Therapeutics, Inc. Stock Analysis
Oncotelic Therapeutics, Inc. Fundamental Analysis
Fundamental analysis in stock investing is like studying the foundation of a house before buying it. It involves looking at a company's financial health, like its earnings, assets, and debts, to determine if it's a good investment based on its fundamental strength and potential for growth.
| # | Analysis | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
PBV
The stock's PBV ratio (1.18x) reflects a fair valuation, making it an attractive option for investors seeking balanced opportunities. |
|
| 2 |
DER
The stock maintains a fair debt to equity ratio (99%), indicating a reasonable balance between the money it owes and the ownership it possesses. |
|
| 3 |
Graham Number
The Graham number calculation reveals that this company's stock price is potentially underestimated, implying that it may be a promising investment option. |
|
| 4 |
ROE
Negative ROE (-76.06%) indicates poor financial performance, raising concerns about profitability and efficiency in utilizing shareholders' equity. |
|
| 5 |
ROA
The stock's ROA (-61.93%) indicates that it's not effectively utilizing its assets to generate profits, making it a less favorable option to invest and earn consistent returns. |
|
| 6 |
Revenue Growth
Company has experienced no growth in revenue over the past three years, suggesting limited profitability and making it a less desirable investment opportunity. |
|
| 7 |
Net Profit Growth
Throughout the last five years, this company's net profit has remained unchanged, indicating a lack of growth and making it a less favorable investment option. |
|
| 8 |
Assets Growth
Regrettably, this company's revenue has shown no signs of growth over the past three years, suggesting limited potential for returns and making it a less appealing choice. |
|
| 9 |
Dividend Growth
The company's dividend growth has remained unchanged for three years, signaling a lack of positive momentum and making it a less favorable investment choice. |
|
| 10 |
Dividend
The company has not distributed any dividends in the past three years, which may raise concerns for investors looking for regular income from their investments. |
|
| 11 |
Buffet Intrinsic Value
The company's stock shows signs of being overvalued (0) according to Warren Buffett's formula, indicating a potential downside as its market price exceeds its estimated intrinsic value. |
Oncotelic Therapeutics, Inc. Technical Analysis
Technical analysis in stock investing is like reading the patterns on a weather map to predict future weather conditions. It involves studying past stock price movements and trading volumes to make predictions about where a stock's price might go next, without necessarily looking at the company's financial health.
| # | Analysis | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Awesome Oscillator | Sell |
| 2 | MACD | Buy |
| 3 | RSI | Hold |
| 4 | Stoch RSI | Sell |
Oncotelic Therapeutics, Inc. Price Chart
Financial Statements
Financial statements are like report cards for companies. They show how much money a company makes (income statement), what it owns and owes (balance sheet), and where it spends its money (cash flow statement), helping stock investors understand if a company is healthy and worth investing in.
Income Statements
An income statement for a company is like a scoreboard for its profits and losses. It shows how much money the company made (revenue) and how much it spent to make that money (expenses), helping stock investors see if a company is making a profit or not.
Revenue in stock investing is the total amount of money a company earns from its sales, and it's a key factor that investors consider to assess a company's financial performance and growth potential.
| Year | Revenue | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 100.000 | |
| 1993 | 100.000 | 0% |
| 1994 | 300.000 | 66.67% |
| 1995 | 100.000 | -200% |
| 1996 | 100.000 | 0% |
| 1997 | 100.000 | 0% |
| 1998 | 100.000 | 0% |
| 1999 | 1.271.918 | 92.14% |
| 2000 | 1.694.944 | 24.96% |
| 2001 | 9.860.012 | 82.81% |
| 2002 | 334.518 | -2847.53% |
| 2003 | 30.000 | -1015.06% |
| 2004 | 7.000 | -328.57% |
| 2005 | 1.000 | -600% |
| 2006 | 0 | 0% |
| 2007 | 12.000 | 100% |
| 2008 | 12.000 | 0% |
| 2009 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010 | 0 | 0% |
| 2011 | 0 | 0% |
| 2012 | 156.000 | 100% |
| 2013 | 95.000 | -64.21% |
| 2014 | 95.000 | 0% |
| 2015 | 0 | 0% |
| 2016 | 0 | 0% |
| 2017 | -100 | 100% |
| 2018 | -100 | 0% |
| 2019 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020 | 1.740.855 | 100% |
| 2021 | 0 | 0% |
| 2022 | 0 | 0% |
| 2023 | 280.000 | 100% |
| 2023 | 70.000 | -300% |
| 2024 | 0 | 0% |
Research and Development Expenses are the costs a company incurs to create and improve its products or services, which can be important for investors to evaluate a company's innovation and potential for future growth.
| Year | Research and Development Expenses | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 | |
| 1993 | 0 | 0% |
| 1994 | 0 | 0% |
| 1995 | 0 | 0% |
| 1996 | 4.800.000 | 100% |
| 1997 | 7.300.000 | 34.25% |
| 1998 | 10.400.000 | 29.81% |
| 1999 | 8.397.799 | -23.84% |
| 2000 | 8.057.671 | -4.22% |
| 2001 | 6.132.283 | -31.4% |
| 2002 | 5.103.272 | -20.16% |
| 2003 | 3.938.000 | -29.59% |
| 2004 | 5.849.000 | 32.67% |
| 2005 | 7.098.000 | 17.6% |
| 2006 | 10.816.000 | 34.38% |
| 2007 | 14.130.000 | 23.45% |
| 2008 | 18.434.000 | 23.35% |
| 2009 | 22.256.000 | 17.17% |
| 2010 | 12.114.000 | -83.72% |
| 2011 | 5.291.000 | -128.95% |
| 2012 | 3.523.000 | -50.18% |
| 2013 | 3.636.000 | 3.11% |
| 2014 | 7.408.000 | 50.92% |
| 2015 | 9.086.000 | 18.47% |
| 2016 | 8.764.000 | -3.67% |
| 2017 | 10.471.000 | 16.3% |
| 2018 | 815.000 | -1184.79% |
| 2019 | 1.372.151 | 40.6% |
| 2020 | 4.302.447 | 68.11% |
| 2021 | 3.658.617 | -17.6% |
| 2022 | 756.910 | -383.36% |
| 2023 | 84.884 | -791.7% |
| 2023 | 61.143 | -38.83% |
| 2024 | 1.008 | -5965.77% |
General and Administrative Expenses are the costs a company incurs to run its day-to-day operations, such as office rent, salaries, and utilities, which investors consider to understand a company's overall efficiency and management effectiveness.
| Year | General and Administrative Expenses | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 | |
| 1993 | 0 | 0% |
| 1994 | 0 | 0% |
| 1995 | 0 | 0% |
| 1996 | 0 | 0% |
| 1997 | 0 | 0% |
| 1998 | 0 | 0% |
| 1999 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000 | 0 | 0% |
| 2001 | 0 | 0% |
| 2002 | 7.438.215.000 | 100% |
| 2003 | 5.282.000 | -140721.94% |
| 2004 | 4.540.000 | -16.34% |
| 2005 | 5.951.000 | 23.71% |
| 2006 | 7.100.000 | 16.18% |
| 2007 | 8.155.000 | 12.94% |
| 2008 | 7.518.000 | -8.47% |
| 2009 | 8.900.000 | 15.53% |
| 2010 | 5.885.000 | -51.23% |
| 2011 | 5.375.000 | -9.49% |
| 2012 | 4.690.000 | -14.61% |
| 2013 | 4.739.000 | 1.03% |
| 2014 | 5.242.000 | 9.6% |
| 2015 | 4.596.000 | -14.06% |
| 2016 | 4.995.000 | 7.99% |
| 2017 | 3.371.000 | -48.18% |
| 2018 | 2.187.000 | -54.14% |
| 2019 | 2.938.726 | 25.58% |
| 2020 | 5.023.142 | 41.5% |
| 2021 | 5.467.266 | 8.12% |
| 2022 | 4.853.664 | -12.64% |
| 2023 | 137.204 | -3437.55% |
| 2023 | 573.726 | 76.09% |
| 2024 | 385.320 | -48.9% |
EBITDA stands for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. It is a measure that helps stock investors analyze a company's profitability by looking at its earnings without considering certain expenses. This helps to get a clearer picture of the company's financial performance and its ability to generate cash flow.
| Year | EBITDA | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | -1.500.000 | |
| 1993 | -2.000.000 | 25% |
| 1994 | -2.800.000 | 28.57% |
| 1995 | -4.400.000 | 36.36% |
| 1996 | -7.200.000 | 38.89% |
| 1997 | -12.400.000 | 41.94% |
| 1998 | -15.300.000 | 18.95% |
| 1999 | -11.717.988 | -30.57% |
| 2000 | -11.138.193 | -5.21% |
| 2001 | -2.675.211 | -316.35% |
| 2002 | -13.405.298 | 80.04% |
| 2003 | -9.668.000 | -38.66% |
| 2004 | -10.811.000 | 10.57% |
| 2005 | -14.045.000 | 23.03% |
| 2006 | -20.189.000 | 30.43% |
| 2007 | -21.989.000 | 8.19% |
| 2008 | -29.110.000 | 24.46% |
| 2009 | -31.203.000 | 6.71% |
| 2010 | -12.228.000 | -155.18% |
| 2011 | -11.679.000 | -4.7% |
| 2012 | -8.035.000 | -45.35% |
| 2013 | -8.283.000 | 2.99% |
| 2014 | -12.653.000 | 34.54% |
| 2015 | -13.690.000 | 7.57% |
| 2016 | -13.739.000 | 0.36% |
| 2017 | -13.833.000 | 0.68% |
| 2018 | -3.250.000 | -325.63% |
| 2019 | -4.250.097 | 23.53% |
| 2020 | -7.220.522 | 41.14% |
| 2021 | -9.064.370 | 20.34% |
| 2022 | -5.064.248 | -78.99% |
| 2023 | 57.912 | 8844.73% |
| 2023 | -564.870 | 110.25% |
| 2024 | -386.320 | -46.22% |
Gross profit is the money a company makes from selling its products or services after subtracting the cost of producing or providing them, and it is an important measure for investors to understand a company's profitability.
| Year | Gross Profit | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 100.000 | |
| 1993 | 100.000 | 0% |
| 1994 | 300.000 | 66.67% |
| 1995 | 100.000 | -200% |
| 1996 | 100.000 | 0% |
| 1997 | 100.000 | 0% |
| 1998 | 200.000 | 50% |
| 1999 | 16.274 | -1128.95% |
| 2000 | 79.967 | 79.65% |
| 2001 | 8.351.640 | 99.04% |
| 2002 | 334.518 | -2396.62% |
| 2003 | 30.000 | -1015.06% |
| 2004 | -10.473.000 | 100.29% |
| 2005 | -13.047.000 | 19.73% |
| 2006 | -17.916.000 | 27.18% |
| 2007 | -22.261.000 | 19.52% |
| 2008 | -25.928.000 | 14.14% |
| 2009 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010 | 0 | 0% |
| 2011 | 0 | 0% |
| 2012 | 156.000 | 100% |
| 2013 | 95.000 | -64.21% |
| 2014 | 95.000 | 0% |
| 2015 | -20.000 | 575% |
| 2016 | -19.000 | -5.26% |
| 2017 | -9.100 | -108.79% |
| 2018 | -34.289 | 73.46% |
| 2019 | -60.603 | 43.42% |
| 2020 | 1.740.855 | 103.48% |
| 2021 | -61.513 | 2930.06% |
| 2022 | -12.841 | -379.04% |
| 2023 | 280.000 | 104.59% |
| 2023 | 70.000 | -300% |
| 2024 | 0 | 0% |
Net income in stock investing is like the money a company actually gets to keep as profit after paying all its bills, and it's an important measure to understand how well a company is doing financially.
| Year | Net Profit | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | -1.600.000 | |
| 1993 | -2.000.000 | 20% |
| 1994 | -2.800.000 | 28.57% |
| 1995 | -3.700.000 | 24.32% |
| 1996 | -6.000.000 | 38.33% |
| 1997 | -8.100.000 | 25.93% |
| 1998 | -11.500.000 | 29.57% |
| 1999 | -10.448.865 | -10.06% |
| 2000 | -9.087.446 | -14.98% |
| 2001 | -4.138.610 | -119.58% |
| 2002 | -11.013.327 | 62.42% |
| 2003 | -8.368.000 | -31.61% |
| 2004 | -10.024.000 | 16.52% |
| 2005 | -11.909.000 | 15.83% |
| 2006 | -15.457.000 | 22.95% |
| 2007 | -20.389.000 | 24.19% |
| 2008 | -21.401.000 | 4.73% |
| 2009 | -24.728.000 | 13.45% |
| 2010 | -23.770.000 | -4.03% |
| 2011 | -9.653.000 | -146.24% |
| 2012 | -8.079.000 | -19.48% |
| 2013 | -8.277.000 | 2.39% |
| 2014 | -12.647.000 | 34.55% |
| 2015 | -13.654.000 | 7.38% |
| 2016 | -13.654.000 | 0% |
| 2017 | -13.812.000 | 1.14% |
| 2018 | -2.737.000 | -404.64% |
| 2019 | -7.387.615 | 62.95% |
| 2020 | -11.500.923 | 35.77% |
| 2021 | -11.393.855 | -0.94% |
| 2022 | 17.819.719 | 163.94% |
| 2023 | 461.236 | -3763.47% |
| 2023 | -7.903.093 | 105.84% |
| 2024 | -839.348 | -841.58% |
EPS, or earnings per share, is a measure that shows how much profit a company has earned for each outstanding share of its stock, and it is important for stock investors as it helps understand the profitability of a company and compare it with other companies in the market.
| Year | Earning per Share (EPS) | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | -108 | |
| 1993 | -120 | 10% |
| 1994 | -134 | 10.45% |
| 1995 | -151 | 11.26% |
| 1996 | -194 | 21.76% |
| 1997 | -199 | 2.53% |
| 1998 | -271 | 26.94% |
| 1999 | -244 | -11.07% |
| 2000 | -195 | -25.13% |
| 2001 | -88 | -121.59% |
| 2002 | -211 | 58.29% |
| 2003 | -152 | -38.82% |
| 2004 | -145 | -4.83% |
| 2005 | -145 | 0% |
| 2006 | -134 | -8.21% |
| 2007 | -175 | 23.43% |
| 2008 | -168 | -4.79% |
| 2009 | -111 | -50.45% |
| 2010 | -72 | -56.34% |
| 2011 | -10 | -610% |
| 2012 | -5 | -100% |
| 2013 | -3 | -150% |
| 2014 | -1 | 0% |
| 2015 | -1 | 0% |
| 2016 | -1 | 0% |
| 2017 | -1 | 0% |
| 2018 | 0 | 0% |
| 2019 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020 | 0 | 0% |
| 2021 | 0 | 0% |
| 2022 | 0 | 0% |
| 2023 | 0 | 0% |
| 2023 | 0 | 0% |
| 2024 | 0 | 0% |
Cashflow Statements
Cashflow statements show the movement of money in and out of a company, helping stock investors understand how much money a company makes and spends. By examining cashflow statements, investors can assess if a company is generating enough cash to pay its bills, invest in growth, and provide returns to stockholders.
Free cash flow is the leftover cash that a company generates after covering its operating expenses and capital expenditures, which is important for stock investors as it shows how much money a company has available to invest in growth, pay dividends, or reduce debt.
| Year | Free Cashflow | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | -1.600.000 | |
| 1993 | -1.400.000 | -14.29% |
| 1994 | -3.100.000 | 54.84% |
| 1995 | -3.300.000 | 6.06% |
| 1996 | -5.100.000 | 35.29% |
| 1997 | -8.300.000 | 38.55% |
| 1998 | -8.600.000 | 3.49% |
| 1999 | -11.332.382 | 24.11% |
| 2000 | -453.655 | -2398.02% |
| 2001 | -9.199.857 | 95.07% |
| 2002 | -8.515.413 | -8.04% |
| 2003 | -7.786.000 | -9.37% |
| 2004 | -10.441.000 | 25.43% |
| 2005 | -10.610.000 | 1.59% |
| 2006 | -13.497.000 | 21.39% |
| 2007 | -17.279.000 | 21.89% |
| 2008 | -23.511.000 | 26.51% |
| 2009 | -28.778.000 | 18.3% |
| 2010 | -20.427.000 | -40.88% |
| 2011 | -11.784.000 | -73.35% |
| 2012 | -8.343.000 | -41.24% |
| 2013 | -7.036.000 | -18.58% |
| 2014 | -12.168.000 | 42.18% |
| 2015 | -11.940.000 | -1.91% |
| 2016 | -15.238.000 | 21.64% |
| 2017 | -10.932.000 | -39.39% |
| 2018 | -2.844.000 | -284.39% |
| 2019 | -2.280.690 | -24.7% |
| 2020 | -2.812.001 | 18.89% |
| 2021 | -4.434.465 | 36.59% |
| 2022 | -1.452.562 | -205.29% |
| 2023 | -1.321.047 | -9.96% |
| 2023 | -248.850 | -430.86% |
| 2024 | -231.416 | -7.53% |
Operating cash flow represents the cash generated or consumed by a company's day-to-day operations, excluding external investing or financing activities, and is crucial for stock investors as it shows how much cash a company is generating from its core business operations.
| Year | Operating Cashflow | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | -1.600.000 | |
| 1993 | -1.400.000 | -14.29% |
| 1994 | -3.100.000 | 54.84% |
| 1995 | -3.300.000 | 6.06% |
| 1996 | -5.000.000 | 34% |
| 1997 | -8.100.000 | 38.27% |
| 1998 | -8.600.000 | 5.81% |
| 1999 | -11.311.021 | 23.97% |
| 2000 | 183.245 | 6272.62% |
| 2001 | -9.040.752 | 102.03% |
| 2002 | -8.500.820 | -6.35% |
| 2003 | -7.751.000 | -9.67% |
| 2004 | -10.391.000 | 25.41% |
| 2005 | -10.498.000 | 1.02% |
| 2006 | -13.303.000 | 21.09% |
| 2007 | -17.184.000 | 22.58% |
| 2008 | -23.398.000 | 26.56% |
| 2009 | -28.669.000 | 18.39% |
| 2010 | -20.427.000 | -40.35% |
| 2011 | -11.784.000 | -73.35% |
| 2012 | -8.335.000 | -41.38% |
| 2013 | -7.001.000 | -19.05% |
| 2014 | -12.151.000 | 42.38% |
| 2015 | -11.927.000 | -1.88% |
| 2016 | -15.238.000 | 21.73% |
| 2017 | -10.932.000 | -39.39% |
| 2018 | -2.844.000 | -284.39% |
| 2019 | -2.280.690 | -24.7% |
| 2020 | -2.812.001 | 18.89% |
| 2021 | -4.434.465 | 36.59% |
| 2022 | -1.452.562 | -205.29% |
| 2023 | -1.321.047 | -9.96% |
| 2023 | -248.850 | -430.86% |
| 2024 | -231.416 | -7.53% |
Capex, short for capital expenditures, refers to the money a company spends on acquiring or upgrading tangible assets like buildings, equipment, or technology, which is important for stock investors as it indicates how much a company is investing in its infrastructure to support future growth and profitability.
| Year | Capital Expenditure | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 | |
| 1993 | 0 | 0% |
| 1994 | 0 | 0% |
| 1995 | 0 | 0% |
| 1996 | 100.000 | 100% |
| 1997 | 200.000 | 50% |
| 1998 | 0 | 0% |
| 1999 | 21.361 | 100% |
| 2000 | 636.900 | 96.65% |
| 2001 | 159.105 | -300.3% |
| 2002 | 14.593 | -990.28% |
| 2003 | 35.000 | 58.31% |
| 2004 | 50.000 | 30% |
| 2005 | 112.000 | 55.36% |
| 2006 | 194.000 | 42.27% |
| 2007 | 95.000 | -104.21% |
| 2008 | 113.000 | 15.93% |
| 2009 | 109.000 | -3.67% |
| 2010 | 0 | 0% |
| 2011 | 0 | 0% |
| 2012 | 8.000 | 100% |
| 2013 | 35.000 | 77.14% |
| 2014 | 17.000 | -105.88% |
| 2015 | 13.000 | -30.77% |
| 2016 | 0 | 0% |
| 2017 | 0 | 0% |
| 2018 | 0 | 0% |
| 2019 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020 | 0 | 0% |
| 2021 | 0 | 0% |
| 2022 | 0 | 0% |
| 2023 | 0 | 0% |
| 2023 | 0 | 0% |
| 2024 | 0 | 0% |
Balance Sheet
Balance sheets provide a snapshot of a company's financial health and its assets (such as cash, inventory, and property) and liabilities (like debts and obligations) at a specific point in time. For stock investors, balance sheets help assess the company's overall worth and evaluate its ability to meet financial obligations and support future growth.
Equity refers to the ownership interest or stake that shareholders have in a company, representing their claim on its assets and earnings after all debts and liabilities are paid.
| Year | Equity | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | -2.800.000 | |
| 1993 | 7.200.000 | 138.89% |
| 1994 | 4.500.000 | -60% |
| 1995 | 10.600.000 | 57.55% |
| 1996 | 40.500.000 | 73.83% |
| 1997 | 40.200.000 | -0.75% |
| 1998 | 30.200.000 | -33.11% |
| 1999 | 31.102.706 | 2.9% |
| 2000 | 21.146.350 | -47.08% |
| 2001 | 18.519.666 | -14.18% |
| 2002 | 10.020.157 | -84.82% |
| 2003 | 16.470.000 | 39.16% |
| 2004 | 29.135.000 | 43.47% |
| 2005 | 56.534.000 | 48.46% |
| 2006 | 43.420.000 | -30.2% |
| 2007 | 24.857.000 | -74.68% |
| 2008 | 28.739.000 | 13.51% |
| 2009 | 5.799.000 | -395.59% |
| 2010 | -5.255.000 | 210.35% |
| 2011 | 8.797.000 | 159.74% |
| 2012 | 4.546.000 | -93.51% |
| 2013 | 6.043.000 | 24.77% |
| 2014 | 29.004.000 | 79.16% |
| 2015 | 25.350.000 | -14.41% |
| 2016 | 12.500.000 | -102.8% |
| 2017 | -477.000 | 2720.55% |
| 2018 | -362.000 | -31.77% |
| 2019 | 16.901.675 | 102.14% |
| 2020 | 12.480.833 | -35.42% |
| 2021 | 8.158.431 | -52.98% |
| 2022 | 19.193.412 | 57.49% |
| 2023 | 12.085.546 | -58.81% |
| 2023 | 11.611.537 | -4.08% |
| 2024 | 11.503.623 | -0.94% |
Assets represent the valuable resources that a company owns, such as cash, inventory, property, and equipment, and understanding a company's assets helps investors assess its value and potential for generating future profits.
| Year | Assets | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 200.000 | |
| 1993 | 7.600.000 | 97.37% |
| 1994 | 4.800.000 | -58.33% |
| 1995 | 11.200.000 | 57.14% |
| 1996 | 41.200.000 | 72.82% |
| 1997 | 41.200.000 | 0% |
| 1998 | 33.000.000 | -24.85% |
| 1999 | 42.659.727 | 22.64% |
| 2000 | 31.229.242 | -36.6% |
| 2001 | 22.153.347 | -40.97% |
| 2002 | 13.598.321 | -62.91% |
| 2003 | 20.205.000 | 32.7% |
| 2004 | 31.757.000 | 36.38% |
| 2005 | 60.268.000 | 47.31% |
| 2006 | 47.642.000 | -26.5% |
| 2007 | 30.064.000 | -58.47% |
| 2008 | 35.031.000 | 14.18% |
| 2009 | 15.617.000 | -124.31% |
| 2010 | 5.567.000 | -180.53% |
| 2011 | 11.056.000 | 49.65% |
| 2012 | 5.447.000 | -102.97% |
| 2013 | 7.294.000 | 25.32% |
| 2014 | 30.423.000 | 76.02% |
| 2015 | 27.453.000 | -10.82% |
| 2016 | 14.114.000 | -94.51% |
| 2017 | 1.172.000 | -1104.27% |
| 2018 | 799.000 | -46.68% |
| 2019 | 23.684.781 | 96.63% |
| 2020 | 23.663.205 | -0.09% |
| 2021 | 23.613.351 | -0.21% |
| 2022 | 36.116.819 | 34.62% |
| 2023 | 30.096.053 | -20.01% |
| 2023 | 30.014.952 | -0.27% |
| 2024 | 29.935.173 | -0.27% |
Liabilities refer to the financial obligations or debts that a company owes to creditors or external parties, and understanding a company's liabilities is important for investors as it helps assess the company's financial risk and ability to meet its obligations.
| Year | Liabilities | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 200.000 | |
| 1993 | 400.000 | 50% |
| 1994 | 300.000 | -33.33% |
| 1995 | 600.000 | 50% |
| 1996 | 700.000 | 14.29% |
| 1997 | 1.000.000 | 30% |
| 1998 | 2.800.000 | 64.29% |
| 1999 | 11.557.021 | 75.77% |
| 2000 | 10.082.892 | -14.62% |
| 2001 | 3.633.681 | -177.48% |
| 2002 | 3.578.164 | -1.55% |
| 2003 | 3.735.000 | 4.2% |
| 2004 | 2.622.000 | -42.45% |
| 2005 | 3.734.000 | 29.78% |
| 2006 | 4.222.000 | 11.56% |
| 2007 | 5.207.000 | 18.92% |
| 2008 | 6.292.000 | 17.24% |
| 2009 | 9.818.000 | 35.91% |
| 2010 | 10.822.000 | 9.28% |
| 2011 | 2.259.000 | -379.06% |
| 2012 | 901.000 | -150.72% |
| 2013 | 1.251.000 | 27.98% |
| 2014 | 1.419.000 | 11.84% |
| 2015 | 2.103.000 | 32.52% |
| 2016 | 1.614.000 | -30.3% |
| 2017 | 1.649.000 | 2.12% |
| 2018 | 1.161.000 | -42.03% |
| 2019 | 6.783.106 | 82.88% |
| 2020 | 11.182.372 | 39.34% |
| 2021 | 15.454.920 | 27.65% |
| 2022 | 16.923.407 | 8.68% |
| 2023 | 18.010.507 | 6.04% |
| 2023 | 18.403.415 | 2.13% |
| 2024 | 18.431.550 | 0.15% |
Oncotelic Therapeutics, Inc. Financial Ratio (TTM)
Valuation Metrics
- Revenue per Share
- 0
- Net Income per Share
- -0
- Price to Earning Ratio
- -8.43x
- Price To Sales Ratio
- 150.9x
- POCF Ratio
- -8.02
- PFCF Ratio
- -8.12
- Price to Book Ratio
- 0.86
- EV to Sales
- 335.3
- EV Over EBITDA
- -64.7
- EV to Operating CashFlow
- -18.03
- EV to FreeCashFlow
- -18.03
- Earnings Yield
- -0.12
- FreeCashFlow Yield
- -0.12
- Market Cap
- 0,01 Bil.
- Enterprise Value
- 0,02 Bil.
- Graham Number
- 0.05
- Graham NetNet
- -0.05
Income Statement Metrics
- Net Income per Share
- -0
- Income Quality
- 0.16
- ROE
- -0.1
- Return On Assets
- -0.04
- Return On Capital Employed
- -0.03
- Net Income per EBT
- 0.82
- EBT Per Ebit
- 4.14
- Ebit per Revenue
- -5.18
- Effective Tax Rate
- 0.18
Margins
- Sales, General, & Administrative to Revenue
- 5.71
- Research & Developement to Revenue
- 0.47
- Stock Based Compensation to Revenue
- 0
- Gross Profit Margin
- 1
- Operating Profit Margin
- -5.18
- Pretax Profit Margin
- -21.48
- Net Profit Margin
- -17.7
Dividends
- Dividend Yield
- 0
- Dividend Yield %
- 0
- Payout Ratio
- 0
- Dividend Per Share
- 0
Operating Metrics
- Operating Cashflow per Share
- -0
- Free CashFlow per Share
- -0
- Capex to Operating CashFlow
- 0
- Capex to Revenue
- 0
- Capex to Depreciation
- 0
- Return on Invested Capital
- -0.01
- Return on Tangible Assets
- -0.05
- Days Sales Outstanding
- 98.95
- Days Payables Outstanding
- 0
- Days of Inventory on Hand
- 0
- Receivables Turnover
- 3.69
- Payables Turnover
- 0
- Inventory Turnover
- 0
- Capex per Share
- 0
Balance Sheet
- Cash per Share
- 0,00
- Book Value per Share
- 0,03
- Tangible Book Value per Share
- 0.01
- Shareholders Equity per Share
- 0.03
- Interest Debt per Share
- 0.03
- Debt to Equity
- 1.07
- Debt to Assets
- 0.43
- Net Debt to EBITDA
- -35.58
- Current Ratio
- 0.01
- Tangible Asset Value
- 0,00 Bil.
- Net Current Asset Value
- -0,02 Bil.
- Invested Capital
- -8922486
- Working Capital
- -0,02 Bil.
- Intangibles to Total Assets
- 0.24
- Average Receivables
- 0,00 Bil.
- Average Payables
- 0,00 Bil.
- Average Inventory
- 0
- Debt to Market Cap
- 1.23
Dividends
Dividends in stock investing are like rewards that companies give to their shareholders. They are a portion of the company's profits distributed to investors, typically in the form of cash payments, as a way for them to share in the company's success.
| Year | Dividends | Growth |
|---|
Oncotelic Therapeutics, Inc. Profile
About Oncotelic Therapeutics, Inc.
Oncotelic Therapeutics, Inc., a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, engages in developing drugs for the treatment of orphan oncology indications. The company's lead product candidate is OT-101, an antisense against TGF-ß2, which is in phase 3 clinical trials for pancreatic cancer and glioblastoma, as well as develops OT-101 for the treatment of various viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome and coronavirus. It also develops OXi4503 for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes; and CA4P for the treatment of advanced metastatic melanoma. The company is headquartered in Agoura Hills, California.
- CEO
- Dr. Vuong Trieu Ph.D.
- Employee
- 22
- Address
-
29397 Agoura Road
Agoura Hills, 91301
Oncotelic Therapeutics, Inc. Executives & BODs
| # | Name | Age |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Dr. Anthony E. Maida III, B.A., MA, MBA, Ph.D. Chief Medical Officer Translation Medicine & Director |
70 |
| 2 |
Dr. Seymour Howard Fein M.D. Chief Regulatory Officer & Chief Medical Officer |
70 |
| 3 |
Dr. Vuong Trieu Ph.D. Chairman & Chief Executive Officer |
70 |
| 4 |
Mr. Amit Shah Chief Financial Officer |
70 |
| 5 |
Mr. Saranjit Saund CBO & GM of AI Division |
70 |
| 6 |
Mr. Steven W. King Consultant & Director |
70 |
| 7 |
Dr. Larn Hwang Chief Scientific Officer |
70 |
| 8 |
Mr. Burcak Beser Chief Technology Officer of AI Division |
70 |
Oncotelic Therapeutics, Inc. Competitors
